AVEN
Indicative pricing
Starting figures for budget planning; a final proposal follows scope discovery.
Indicative pricing
Budget by scope, confirm after discovery
The figures below are indicative for budgeting, excluding VAT and certification-body fees. They are neither final quotations nor certification promises. Complex or specialist scopes receive a separate proposal after the work is understood.
A comparable proposal needs work, outputs, sessions, responsibilities, assumptions and exclusions. A fixed number should not hide differences in sites, shifts, existing records or internal capacity.
01
Current starting levels
“From” indicates a minimum comparable scope, not a universal package. A current-state review establishes sources and priorities; it does not design or operate an entire system. A lean foundation assumes an internal coordinator and a narrow flow that can be piloted.
Current-state review — from VND 8 million
Focused interviews, existing-record sampling and a priority report. Suitable when the organisation needs a starting point before committing to a larger programme.
Lean foundation — from VND 35 million
A narrow scope, one internal coordinator and an observable pilot flow. Specific outputs are recorded in the post-discovery proposal.
Operating system — from VND 65 million
Design, guided adoption and one pilot cycle within an agreed scope. The number of processes and sites shapes actual effort.
Multi-site scope — from VND 115 million
Common work and site variations require discovery before a price is confirmed. One pilot template is not automatically applied to every location.
Monthly review — from VND 4 million/month
Review exceptions, actions, due dates and a one-page report for an existing scope. Frequency and sessions are agreed in the engagement.
Additional standard — from VND 18 million/month
Scope follows a map of reusable and specialist work. Any specialist input is identified separately when needed.
02
What changes the effort
Legal entities, sites, shifts and contractors determine participation and control variants. A single-shift factory differs markedly from a multi-site chain; the same standard name does not imply the same effort. Process count, available documents and record reliability also affect discovery and revision sessions.
Safety, food, environmental or information-security specialists may be needed for technical controls and obligations. We identify who validates that work and the related fee before proceeding. Owner availability and response time affect scheduling because operating records must come from real work.
- Multi-site work often needs a one-site pilot, revision and then rollout.
- Edition transitions need time to review changes, issue versions and accumulate new records.
03
What is included and excluded
Within the agreed scope, a proposal may include discovery sessions, a current-state map, control design, sourced drafts, user guidance, a pilot flow, an action list and handover. These outputs are not automatically included at every price: the proposal’s work table controls. The organisation retains its data and approvers.
Indicative fees exclude VAT, independent certification or audit fees, licensed standard copies, out-of-scope travel and unagreed specialist work. We cannot guarantee certification, create records of activities that never happened or approve on leadership’s behalf. Any scope change is agreed before additional work begins.
04
Examples of choosing a level
Illustrative scenario — a 25-person service firm cannot identify the weak point in request intake: an 8-million review may be more useful than immediate implementation. Only after sampling actual work can the team decide whether a lean foundation or a few handoff fixes are needed. This is a scope example, not a client or actual quote.
Illustrative scenario — a manufacturer with three shifts and two sites has procedures but inconsistent records: an operating-system or multi-site scope may fit, depending on pilot flows. If work is already stable and monthly independent review is the need, maintenance may fit better. Similar headcount can still produce very different scopes.
05
How to get a specific proposal
Share the activity, sites, approximate participants, standard of interest, document status and three main problems. Do not send project records, sensitive personal data or credentials through the public form. We confirm a discovery scope, then speak with the coordinator and decision-maker at an agreed time.
The post-discovery proposal lists phased work, checkable outputs, sessions, indicative timing, secure information needs, approvers, fee, VAT, exclusions and change control. The organisation can use it to compare options and decide with enough information.
Next step
Start with a scope that can be checked
Self-check first, or send an outline of your scope so we can agree outputs, sessions and specialist needs. Do not send sensitive records through the public form.
We provide consulting and training; certification decisions are made independently by certification bodies.